Hong Kong fully implements targeted financial sanctions in compliance with the United Nations Security Council Resolutions (“UNSC Resolutions”), pursuant to the United Nations Sanctions Ordinance (Cap. 537) (“UNSO”) (its 12 subsidiary regulations) and the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance (Cap. 575) (“UNATMO”).
Hong Kong does not implement sanctions above and beyond those imposed by the United Nations Security Council (“UNSC”). The Security Bureau maintains lists of designated individuals and entities under the UNATMO, which covers the UNSC Resolution 1373 relating to terrorism financing, while the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau (“CEDB”) maintains list of designated individuals and entities under the UNSO.
Before engaging in a business relationship or providing legal advice, members should ensure that they do not deal with designated individuals and entities sanctioned by the UNSC. Members are required to screen the names of their clients, their representatives, beneficial owner(s) and connected parties against the names (and aliases) of designated individuals and entities on a risk sensitive basis.
The Hong Kong Government or its regulators, including the Law Society, do not issue or maintain any form of sanctions or designated individuals and entities list but they do have a supervisory role within the targeted financial sanctions regime in relation to firms’ systems and controls for complying with these legal requirements.
Sanctions imposed by foreign governments are not part of the international targeted financial sanctions regime and have no legal status in Hong Kong. Therefore, no obligation is created on the firms under Hong Kong law to comply with other sanctions regimes. However, members must be aware of the extraterritorial application of other sanction regimes for example the Office of Foreign Assets Control - Sanctions Programs (US), the European Union Sanctions List (EU) and Her Majesty Treasury Sanctions List (UK). It is crucial for a firm to consider its operations and risks, its obligations under sanctions-related and existing money laundering and terrorist financing laws, and whether the provision of a firm’s legal services may have wider sanctions-related implications for its client.